Even Your Political Opponents Want to Believe They’re Good People
Keith Payne believes politics is just a weapon we use to fight the real battle: defending our belief that we’re good, reasonable people.
From the Greater Good Science Center at UC Berkeley
If you assume that someone dislikes or distrusts you—or has harmful motives—you’re likely to approach them with anxiety that can negatively impact the interaction before it even begins. Without a doubt, sometimes these concerns are justified—but too often, they end up undermining connection. If you’re willing to question your assumptions and instead approach the other person with curiosity, the experience is likely to be better for both of you.
If you assume that someone on campus dislikes or distrusts you—or has harmful motives—you’re likely to approach them with anxiety that can negatively impact the interaction before it even begins. Without a doubt, sometimes these concerns are justified—but too often, they end up undermining connection. If you’re willing to question your assumptions and instead approach the other person with curiosity, the experience is likely to be better for both of you.
On the first day of classes at Linn-Benton Community College, Speech Communication faculty member Mark Urista leads an activity where students share a little bit about themselves with one another using a prompt like: “What is something that people wouldn’t know about you just by looking at you?”
This helps students question initial assumptions they might make about one another, which creates a less threatening classroom environment.
The following week, he builds on this by assigning students to write and deliver a speech that identifies a social problem they really care about. Afterwards, the class responds to prompts like: “Did the speaker convince you that there's a problem?”, “Did the speaker convince you that their solution will work?”, “Did the speaker convince you that you will personally benefit?” Why or why not?
He then asks the students receiving feedback to assume good intent: their peers are answering these prompts to help them learn and grow. According to Urista, that framing leads students to say, “Oh, yeah, I never really considered that point,” rather than taking the feedback too personally or straining classroom relationships.
Studies the practice is based on.
Mechanisms for coping with status-based rejection expectations.
Mendoza-Denton, R., Page-Gould, E., & Pietrzak, J. (2006). In Levin S., van Laar C., (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives, the Claremont symposium on Applied Social Psychology (151–169). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Trawalter, S., Adam, E. K., Chase–Lansdale, P. L., & Richeson, J. A. (2012). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 682–693.
Turner, R. N., & Cameron, L. (2016). Social Issues and Policy Review, 10(1), 212–246.